Interview with Knesset Member Uri Ariel
by Shai Gefen
Snapshot Bio – Uri Ariel: Over the last few decades Uri
Ariel has been at the forefront of the struggle to settle Yehuda, Aza, and the
Shomron, and is considered the mover and shaker of the settler movement. He
initiated and constructed dozens of settlements, and also served as the
assistant for settlement issues to the Minister of Security.
Uri has served in a number of leadership positions within
Yesha, most recently as the Chairman of the Yesha Council. Just until two weeks
ago, he also served as the Director of the Municipal Council of Beit El, one of
the largest settlements.
Following the assassination of Minister Ze’evi, Uri began to
serve as a Member of Parliament representing the Nationalist Unity Party.
People who pride themselves on representing justice and
logic, are actively working on transferring their fellow Jews. It’s simply one
of the most terrible sins one could think up.
The army is doing outstanding work, and this is vital, for up
until two months ago this wasn’t happening at all. Yet we still haven’t arrived
at the real solution which is eliminating the P.A.
The children in Yesha haven’t even lost a day of school, and
the real heroines of our generation are the mothers of Yesha, who stay to guard
the land at any price.
* * *
The expression "Knesset Member Uri Ariel" sounds strange,
doesn’t it?
It is surprising, and this results from the resignation of
two Knesset members from the Nationalist Unity party, Benny Begin and Chanan
Porat, and following the assassination of Rechavam Ze’evi. That’s how it became
my turn to join the Knesset. After consulting with Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu and
my family, I decided to join the Knesset. I will try to be of service in this
role too.
There’s no comparison between knowing the Knesset from the
outside and knowing it from the inside. Now I’m busy learning the ropes and I
hope and pray that I can be of help to Ahm Yisroel and Eretz Yisroel.
How do you feel in the Knesset?
Right now I feel like a student in a new place who has to
learn everything. I feel more comfortable in the field than I do in the Knesset.
You prefer the hills and the rocky slopes?
(smiling) In principle, yes. I love to transform the rocky
hills into developed land. It’s what I’ve done for many years with my friends.
But as I said, after consulting with rabbanim, family, and friends, I
came to the conclusion that I can be of use in the Knesset too, and I will try
to do so to the best of my abilities.
Until now you were on the other side of the barricades, as a
lobbyist in the Knesset?
Right, those are the facts. On the other hand, I think every
effort must be made so that there are many people in the Knesset who believe in
our approach and will do good work. The job fell to me for tragic reasons, and I
will try to do my best.
What is your first legislative goal?
My first goal is obviously, settling Yesha, the Golan, and
the entire country. I think settling the land must be strengthened. I also want
to be involved in strengthening the area of absorption and immigration. There
are people already involved in this, like Deputy Minister of Absorption, Yuli
Edelstein, and the chairman of the committee for immigration and absorption,
Tzvi Hendel, and I will try to help them.
You are replacing Ze’evi in the Knesset. Ze’evi was attacked
and besmirched for championing the idea of voluntary Transfer [i.e., offering
incentives to the Arabs to resettle elsewhere]. What do you think about it?
Ze’evi always spoke about voluntary Transfer and his enemies
besmirched him for this and said it was out of the question. Today, I don’t
think there’s a Jew in the country who doesn’t support voluntary Transfer,
except for some marginal groups. During the Six Day War we didn’t take advantage
of the momentum when hundreds of thousands of Arabs left the country, and we
didn’t encourage their leaving. The Lubavitcher Rebbe spoke a number of times
about the Israeli government’s mistake in this. Furthermore, at a certain point,
Defense Minister Moshe Dayan closed the gates and did not allow the Arabs to
flee. If that wasn’t enough, he brought back some Arabs from Jordan, which was a
terrible mistake because no one can promise us that we won’t have a similar
situation in which the Arabs will want to leave voluntarily.
I think that Ze’evi’s platform is a platform that most
Israelis agree with, and this was also checked out in the polls. Perhaps now it
is not feasible to carry out, but in today’s situation in the Middle East, when
things change every minute, nobody can promise us that the situation will not
present itself in the future as realistic.
It’s the Left who are now talking about involuntary Transfer
- for the Jews of Yesha!
There can be nothing worse. People who pride themselves on
representing justice and logic, are actively working on transferring their
fellow Jews. It’s simply one of the most terrible sins one could think up. I am
sure it won’t happen, but just talking about it is terrifying.
You’ve entered the Knesset in very confused times, both
regarding politics and security. We hear President Bush talk about a Palestinian
state alongside Israel. How do you think Israel ought to react?
Israel must say one thing clearly, and unfortunately it
doesn’t say it and might even say something else entirely: There is no reason
for another country west of the Jordan! They cannot have authority over Eretz
Yisroel, which belongs solely to the Jewish people. I am very upset by
announcements by the Prime Minister and Foreign Minister on this topic, and for
this reason, when I heard what Bush said, I am not at all surprised. First we
have to clean up our own house.
Two weeks ago all the members of the Bloc sat down with the
Prime Minister and he told us that a Palestinian state is not on the agenda. He
said that if there was any change in the matter, it would be brought to open
debate in the Knesset. But I can tell you that as soon as it even comes up we
won’t be in this government, and we will do all we can to topple it.
I think it was two days before Ze’evi’s murder that Sharon
spoke in a very public forum about a Palestinian state.
I remember it well. He said it at a meeting of Likkud
activists in Kiryat Mochkin. We protested and are pained over this. There’s no
question this is extremely serious, but at the moment the government is not
discussing it and so there’s still a difference.
People sense that something’s brewing as far as the
establishment of a Palestinian state.
I don’t feel it, but I’m afraid that something is going on as
far as dealing with the Americans in connection with the Coalition against the
Taliban. We told the Prime Minister that perhaps we understand what he is trying
to accomplish by these tactics, but we also know what will result in the end. We
remember good and well what happened with all Begin’s tactics at Camp David, and
what happened with Rabin, Netanyahu, and Barak’s tactics. There cannot be any
tactics in these matters, because in the end we pay for it. Somebody keeps track
of what was said and in the end we pay the bill.
It doesn’t look as though Sharon fears that anybody from the
Right is going to leave his government.
Let’s leave the fears for a moment. The first thing we need
to know is where we are going and what we are doing to ourselves. I tell you
straight that we will not even consider staying in a government that will
approve this political agreement or another. This is not why we chose Sharon to
lead the government. We won’t be part of such a government.
As far as your question as to whether this threatens or
bothers him or not - Sharon said it bothers him, or at least that’s what he told
us. It might happen that it will bother him and he’ll stop, or maybe not. In
light of the political upheavals in recent years, it’s impossible to know
anything except that in this country things change very quickly and you never
know what tomorrow will bring.
Who is running the government, Sharon or Peres?
Sharon is the Prime Minister, but Peres is very powerful and
he uses this power to oppose the principles of the government and the wishes of
the majority of the nation. I think that under the circumstances, Sharon has the
added responsibility of preventing Peres from taking hasty and irreversible
steps.
Since Ze’evi’s murder has there been any change as far as
security policies go?
There is a change but it’s definitely not enough. Here are
the facts: since his assassination three weeks ago, the army entered Area A in a
number of places; it eliminated 46 wanted terrorists from the list of over a
hundred. They also located other terrorists. This was definitely a course of
action we haven’t had until now. But I say let’s not get too excited about it
because it’s nowhere near enough.
What still needs to be done that Sharon’s government is not
doing?
The main question is whether to kill the flies that hover
around the egg or whether to dry out the egg. We think the answer is obvious:
you have to dry out the egg which is the P.A., and get Arafat out of here.
You seem to be critical of the liquidations being done.
You can destroy a number of terrorists like these or others,
but that won’t give us security. The army is doing outstanding work, and this is
vital, for up until two months ago this wasn’t happening at all. Yet we still
haven’t arrived at the real solution which is eliminating the P.A.
You talk about eliminating Arafat and the P.A., but we hear
that Peres is moving forward?
We hear about Peres and at the same time we hear that we
can’t work with Arafat. Even within the Labor party there’s talk about how
impossible he is.
It’s a pity the U.S. hasn’t caught on.
Last week, a delegation of senior officials went to the U.S.
to convey intelligence information. The U.S. is not ready to understand that
even if their needs are being met by a Coalition to fight terror, we have to
consider our own needs, just as America focuses solely on its own security. The
time has come to learn from the Americans in this regard. Unfortunately in the
meantime, we take their wishes too much into consideration.
Ze’evi was killed six hours before his leaving the government
would have gone into effect. Doesn’t that cast a pall over the fact that Benny
Alon took the job of Minister of Tourism?
We were very undecided. The reasons for remaining in the
government despite the situation include two events: the first being the army’s
entering Area A, and the second being Sharon’s declaration that he wouldn’t
accept a Palestinian state. I know that people like to claim that our main
concerns are out seats in the Knesset and our positions, yet I think my
colleagues thought it through and decided based on the situation.
I think you personally strongly opposed being a part of
Sharon’s government, and said the Right should remain in the opposition. How
come?
Because we have a Prime Minister who talks about a
Palestinian state, and his Foreign Minister talks about it too. When you look
around you see that not enough was done as far as security and settling the
land. I wouldn’t say there’s a freeze in construction like there was under
Rabin, but there is definitely not enough being done.
Is there a chance that there will be a change in the
government’s policies?
Despite the changes thus far, they are not enough, and so we
are trying for greater changes. The big question is what will be with the Labor
party. If it leaves the government, then the government is likely to be more on
the Right. But things are murky now and you can’t know what will be.
Wouldn’t it have been a good idea for the Right to be united
in a political bloc in order to deter any political concessions?
We are checking out the possibilities of uniting with Mafdal.
You have to remember that Tekuma and Moledet formed the Ichud HaLeumi, and with
Minister Benny Alon’s initiative they joined forces with Yisroel Beiteinu. Now
we hope to unite with Mafdal and we’re working on it.
A week after the assassination, you made a giant
demonstration, attracting 100,000 participants, in which you called for Arafat
to leave. But it doesn’t look like this is what the government intends on doing,
as it repeatedly says it has no intentions of dismantling the P.A.
My friends and I didn’t expect one demonstration to change
everything, but I think that both the Right and Left saw that the Yesha council
can bring a lot of people to Yerushalayim despite this period of turmoil when
people are afraid to leave their homes.
Everybody understood, including the Prime Minister, that
there’s a great force here that will not compromise. Sharon knows good and well
that if he includes a Palestinian state in his plans or any other compromise, he
will find a very large group who will do everything it can to block him.
Up until two weeks ago you were head of the council appointed
in Beit El; a year and two months after the outbreak of the Intifada, how does
Yesha hold up on the front lines when so many of those murdered were from Yesha?
First of all, all those living in Yesha deserve a huge medal.
As far as how they manage, I don’t have explanations for everything, but the
facts are that even mothers and children are standing strong. More families are
joining them. It seems to depend on their way of life, for most of them believe
that everything is from Heaven.
I was in Mevo Dosan yesterday because of the murder that took
place there on Friday. There were people there from Chermesh who were definitely
unhappy about the government’s not doing enough offensively, but they think
about how to carry on despite it all. These are people with a goal in life, so
it’s easier for them to endure this period, and this is what gives them
strength.
Didn’t they speak about leaving and dismantling?
I have to tell you that we too at the Yesha council were very
doubtful, especially about the dangerous areas where there have been more
terrorist attacks. But it didn’t happen. On the contrary, much to our surprise,
most settlements have grown. I’d like to single out the Amana movement which
settles the land, who do wonderful work.
Arafat spoke about the Lebanon phenomenon repeating itself in
Yesha with the settlers and army fleeing.
With Hashem’s help, this is not happening. The army is
fighting terrorism and Arafat has not succeeded in achieving his goals, and the
settlers have stayed put. The children in Yesha haven’t even lost a day of
school, and the real heroines of our generation are the mothers of Yesha, who
stay to guard the land at any price.
Whoever breaks first will lose. The question is what is the
goal and knowing what we are trying to attain.
What is the goal?
Top of the list is restoring security, and we still have far
to go with that.